The Scientific Foundations of Creativity

Long ago in ancient India, a humble inventor named Sissa ben Dahir created the game of chess to entertain King Balhait of the Persians. Grateful for the clever diversion, the king offered any reward. Sissa, with a sly smile, asked for a modest gift: one grain of rice on the first square of the chessboard, two on the second, four on the third, and so on, doubling each square up to the 64th. The king laughed, thinking it a trivial request, and ordered his granaries filled accordingly. The court scribes began counting: square one held 1 grain; square two, 2; square three, 4; by square ten, just 1,023 grains—barely a handful. The king watched smugly as the piles grew slowly at first. But as the days passed, the numbers swelled. Square 20 demanded over a million grains. Square 30, more than a billion. By square 40, the scribes trembled, reporting a trillion grains, enough to bury villages. The king's treasuries emptied; farmers harvested every field in the realm, yet it wasn't enough. Square 50 required mountains of rice taller than palaces. Desperate, the king begged Sissa to stop, offering half his kingdom instead. On square 64, the total reached 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains—more than all the rice on Earth could provide. Sissa revealed his wisdom: "Great king, this is the magic of doubling, the power of compounding. What begins small grows beyond imagination if given time and consistency."

Humbled, the king embraced the lesson, using it to wisely grow his wealth through patient investments rather than conquest. From that day, rulers across lands taught the tale, reminding all that steady growth defeats even the mightiest fortunes. Sissa demonstrated the power of compounding to a king through creativity.

Did you notice anything? Yup! you are right, Creativity. You might be thinking about what makes a man creative. Is it inborn or can it be cultivated through practice?

Nothing is more creative than evolution when we see the enormous variety around us. Let's dive deep into it to understand the creative genius of Evolution.

The common misconceptions about evolution are:

1. Random mutations happen.

2. Natural Selection keeps the best ones.

3. Over time, the organisms slowly improve.

Natural Selection can choose from what already exists. The real mystery is not about survival but where the new useful traits come from in the first place. Darwin's survival of the fittest explains which traits persist, but it doesn't explain how new traits originate. Evolution depends just as much on the arrival of the fittest as on their survival. If a beneficial trait never appears, it doesn't matter how strong the selection is. Evolution is limited by what variation is possible. This reframes evolution as a creative process, not just a filtering one.

Evolution is creative but not consciously or intentionally. Evolution is a tinkerer who reuses the old parts in new ways. Instead of inventing from scratch, Evolution:

1. Modifies existing genes.

2. Recombines biological components.

3. Repurpose structures for new functions.

It explains that new traits often resemble old ones. Complex features build on simpler foundations. Creativity in evolution comes from what already exists. Mutations are random, but their effects are not equally random. Some biological systems are structured in ways that make useful changes more likely. Others are fragile and break easily. The organisation of biological systems determines how easily they can innovate. Evolution is not just blind chance. The structure of genes, proteins, and networks guides what kind of innovation is possible.

Innovation is taking two things that already exist and putting them together in a new way. Tom Freston

Robust systems are those that continue to function when parts change and tolerate mutations without failing. Systems that resist change are better at producing innovation over time. Evolution continue to function when parts change and tolerate mutations without failing, making it robust and innovative.

Let's see some examples to understand the evolutionary innovation:

1. Antifreeze proteins in Arctic Cod: These fish live in sub-zero waters where most organisms' blood would freeze solid. They produce special proteins that act like natural anti-freeze, preventing ice crystal formation in their bodies.

2. Complex Organs: The evolution of the eye with its lens, retina, and neural connections. The wings for flight and joint knees for effective locomotion.

3. Metabolic breakthroughs: Photosynthesis in plants (capturing sunlight to produce energy), lactose digestion in certain human populations, or camouflage mechanisms in animals like chameleons and octopuses.

These are not incremental improvements but profound innovations that appear uncannily perfect. How could random mutations combined with selection produce such efficiency in just 3.8 billion years of long history?

The space of possible proteins (from amino acid sequences) or metabolic pathways is astronomically large, far larger than the number of atoms in the universe. If mutations were truly random and undirected in this immense space, finding functional innovations would be like searching for a single winning lottery ticket in a cosmic haystack. Pure chance alone seems inefficient to explain the pace and creativity of evolution.

Constraints drive creativity. They don't merely limit possibilities but also guide evolutionary change and foster creativity in the process. Evolution is not only influenced by randomness (through mutations), but is also shaped and directed by underlying constraints. They are like a filter on random mutations. Instead of having an organism to evolve in an infinite number of ways, constraints limit the available paths. This doesn't narrow the possibilities; it also makes certain pathways more likely to be successful. In other words, constraints don't just restrict evolution; they actually guide it towards certain outcomes.

What are the various types of constraints present in nature to guide evolution?

1. Physical Constraints: These are the limitations imposed by the laws of physics and chemistry. For instance, an organism can't evolve a structure that violates basic principles like gravity and thermodynamics. The physical world sets limits on what is possible, like wings that are too heavy would be useless for flight.

2. Developmental Constraints: These are restrictions that arise from how organisms develop from embryos into adults. The process of embryonic development is complex and involves a series of genetic and molecular steps. There are many ways to get from point A to point B, but developmental constraints make some changes more feasible than others. Certain genetic changes might not be possible because they would interfere with key stages of development.

3. Genetic Constraints: Organisms have complex genetic networks where genes don't act independently but interact with other genes. This interconnectedness means that certain mutations might have cascading effects that could be harmful, which limits the range of potential genetic changes. For example, a mutation in one gene might affect the function of many other genes that interact with it, making that mutation more or less likely to be beneficial.

4. Functional Constraints: Biological functions like metabolism, reproduction, or movement also impose constraints on what traits can evolve. A trait has to function properly for the organism to survive and reproduce. For instance, an eye to work, it must be able to detect light, focus images, and be connected to the brain's process centers. There are only so many ways to build a working eye, and these functional constraints limit the possibilities. The basic structure of the eye appears repeatedly in many species because it is constrained by the physics of light detection, biological function, and development.

The constraints make evolution predictable. Although mutations occur randomly, the presence of constraints means that certain evolutionary pathways are more likely than others. Evolution is not a free-for-all where anything can happen, but a process shaped and constrained by the inherent structure of biology. Some mutations are much more likely to result in viable adaptations than others, making evolutionary change predictable to some extent. For example, the evolution of wings in birds, bats, and insects. We see a similar solution in different species. It's not because they are closely related but because there are functional and physical constraints like air pressure, wing structure, and muscle strength that led to similar solutions for flight.

When we are boxed in, creativity thrives. Seth Godin

Biological systems are often redundant, meaning there are multiple ways to achieve the same function or outcome. This redundancy provides stability and flexibility, allowing organisms to adapt to changes or mutations in their environment. If one pathway in the gene networks fails, the other pathways may take over the function, providing backup systems for key biological functions. The immune system is a good example of biological redundancy. If one part of the immune system is compromised, other parts can take over, ensuring survival.

Complex traits don't arise from nothing. Instead, they often evolve from simpler components that interact in constrained ways. Complexity emerges from a combination of simpler parts, not from an entirely new system created from scratch. Evolution builds complexity by modifying and recombining existing genetic networks. Over time, simpler genetic components interact in new ways, resulting in more complex traits. The evolution of multicellular organisms from a unicellular ancestor didn't happen all at once. Instead, it involves the gradual modification of the genetic network and cellular cooperation driven by constraints on how cells can function together.

How does the biological system explore vast genetic possibilities without losing function?

There are many genetic pathways to the same biological function, and that multiplicity enables innovation. Proteins perform most biological functions. Their structure and functions are well studied by the evolutionary biologist Andreas Wagner. He found that proteins demonstrate robustness and diversity. The same protein function can be produced by millions of different amino acid sequences. Each possible protein sequence is a point in a vast space. Neighbouring points differ by just one amino acid. Functional proteins are not isolated but form connected networks in sequence space. Small mutations usually don't destroy function.

Neutral Networks are found in protein Evolution. These networks are a set of different protein sequences that perform the same function and are connected by small mutational steps. Protein populations can move through these networks without changing their functionality. New functions become reachable from new points. Innovation comes from moving within functionally stable regions, not from risky leaps.

Proteins are structurally robust. Many amino acids can be changed without affecting folding. Protein cores are stable, and their surface regions tolerate mutations. This robustness allows accumulation of mutations, increases genetic diversity, and enables later functional shifts.

How do new functions evolve in protein networks?

A protein performs an original function. Neutral mutations accumulate. Proteins drift through sequence space. At some point, a mutation enables a new or improved function. Selection acts on the new function. The key insight is that new solutions often arise from pre-existing structures, not from scratch. Many proteins that perform secondary weak functions are popularly known as promiscuous proteins. These are usually invisible to selection. Environmental change can make them important. For example, an enzyme with a weak side activity. Mutation strengthens that activity. A new metabolic pathway emerges.

Evolution is not a direct climb to higher fitness. It involves exploration, drift, and redundancy. Multiple genetic routes can lead to the same outcome. It explains the repeated discovery of similar traits in different lineages. Laboratory experiments show that most mutations are neutral, functional proteins are abundant, and Innovation is accessible without loss of viability. Life is structured to innovate. It challenges the classic idea that evolution works only through the gradual improvement of traits under constant selection. Instead, evolution is a long period of neutral drifts followed by sudden functional innovation.

Evolutionary innovation comes less from new genes and more from new ways of controlling existing genes. Biological complexity is not mainly about having more parts but about better control systems. Think of genes as workers and gene regulation as management. Most evolutionary novelty comes from changing the management, not by replacing the workers. Genes are useless without control. A gene on its own does nothing unless it is activated at the right time, right place, and right level.

Genes don't act alone. They form gene regulatory networks where some genes encode transcription factors and these factors turn other genes on or off. The feedback loops either stabilize or amplify these activities. These networks control development, determine cell identity(skin cell or neuron), or coordinate responses to the environment. They are the biological equivalent of control circuits. The tiny change in regulation like turning a gene on earlier or later in development, activating a gene in a new tissue, or slightly increasing or decreasing expression levels can produce large visible differences. This is the reason behind rapid evolutionary divergence and big phenotypic changes without new genes.

Gene regulatory networks are modular in nature. The different modules control different traits and changes in one module often don't wreck the whole organism. This modularity limits damage from mutations, allows experimentation, and makes evolution more flexible. The idea of modularity shows compartmental systems are easier to rewire. Just like proteins and metabolic networks, gene regulatory networks are robust to many mutations and buffered by redundancy and feedback. Many regulatory mutations have little immediate effect and hidden variation accumulates. New regulatory combinations can suddenly matter under new conditions. So, robustness at the control layer fuels innovation at the trait layer.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, but only if the parts are organised modularly. Herbet Simon

Evolution is a tinkerer, not an engineer. New traits come from reusing old genes in new contexts. The genes remain same but regulatory changes are common that produce large effects. Complexity emerges not from miracles but from rewiring control systems. Evolution innovates mainly by changing where, when, and how genes act not by inventing entirely new genes.

What you see in organisms is only the surface. Underneath lies a deep structure that quietly shapes what evolution can and can't do. Evolution is guided by an invisible architecture of connections, constraints, and possibilities. Natural selection acts on visible traits but hidden architecture inside organisms determine which traits are even reachable.

Phenotype(Observable traits like shape, structure, etc.) hide enormous internal complexity. Two organisms can look the same, performs same function, and have the same fitness yet be genetically different. Phenotype compress information. Many internal configurations map to the same outward function. This many to one mapping is the foundation of evolutionary flexibility. The genotype and phenotype maps to genetic configurations and traits & functions respectively. This map is highly non-linear, redundant, and structured not random. Small genetic changes can do nothing or cause dramatic shifts depending on where you are in the map.

Neutral networks create hidden architecture because many genotypes produce the same phenotype. They form neutral(genotype) networks and these networks are vast and interconnected. As population drift across these networks fitness stays constant, internal structure changes, and access to new phenotype increases. So the architecture is hidden because the selection doesn't see it but evolution uses it.

Most new biological functions are only a few mutations away. Thanks to the hidden architecture that neutral networks sit next to one another and a small step can cross into a new functional space. It explains sudden evolutionary innovation, parallel evolution, and repeated discovery of similar traits in many species. The word constraint usually sounds limiting but constraints shape exploration and they channel variation into viable directions. Without constraints most mutations would be lethal and the evolution would stall. So, constraints are part of the hidden architecture that makes creativity possible. Evolution is not a random walk but a guided exploration. Life is built on structures that absorb damage, store variation, and keep innovation close at hand. Natural selection filters outcomes but architecture supplies the options.

Learning is of no use unless we implement the ideas in our life. How can we use ideas discussed so far in our lives?

The principles that allow biological evolution to innovate can be used to design new technologies. Nature isn't something we study, it's a problem solving system. By understanding how evolution explores possibilities, we can build better tools, machines, materials, and algorithms.

Traditional engineering follows the following steps:

1. Decide what you want.

2. Design a solution step by step.

3. Optimize it carefully.

But evolution works very differently. It doesn't plan, generates many variations, most variations fail, and few survive and improve gradually. This blind process is actually extremely powerful especially for complex problems where we don't know the best solution in advance and small changes can have unpredictable effects.

In biology, Genotype(the underlying instructions like DNA, code, design rules) and Phenotype(the final outcome like protein shape, behavior, and machine performance). Similarly, in technology genotype is a computer program, design parameters, or code and phenotype is the functioning product(Robot movement, antenna shape, and neural network behavior).

Different genotype can produce similar phenotype. Systems must be robust(not break easily) and explore new design without losing function. That is why, evolutionary approaches work so well in technology. We can use evolutionary algorithms which mimic natural selection.

1. Generate many random solutions.

2. Test their performance.

3. Keep the best ones.

4. Introduce small changes(Mutations).

5. Repeat.

The mutations are especially successful when design space is huge and human intuition fails. For example, Antenna designs for NASA that look bizarre but work better than human designs, Neural networks that evolve rather than explicitly programmed.

Why does evolution beat human intuition?

Human designers were limited by imagination and bias. Evolution explores unexpected solution, find solutions no human would invent, use gradual improvement instead of perfect planning. This mirrors biology where complex organisms weren't design from scratch. They emerged through countless small, workable steps.

Robust systems are more innovative because they tolerate change without breaking. In technology, software that still works after small code change, hardware designs that function despite variations, and algorithms that adapt to new tasks. Robustness allows experimentation and experimentation leads to innovation. Biology isn't about the past but a manual for innovation.

By learning how life evolves complexity, we improve engineering, design better AI, create adaptable and resilient systems. Evolution is not only the source of life's diversity but a general problem solver.

If you have liked this post, please share it with others on WhatsApp, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Please share your feedback in the comment box.

Photo by Merih Tasli on Unsplash

The Mystery of Peacock's Tail

Once there was a man who was living in a small town with his happy family. He was an avid reader and wanted to become the best father in the world. He had two curious kids. His innate desire was to give them the best upbringing in the world. Recently, he read about the concept of forest bathing in one of the books. Forest bathing is a Japanese practice of immersing oneself mindfully in a forest environment to promote relaxation and health. One day, he took his kids to the forest to reap the benefits of forest bathing. As they were enjoying the splendid beauty of the forest, one of his kids saw a beautiful peacock. The bright, heavy, and colorful tail caught the attention of a kid. He immediately asked his father, Dad, why do peacocks have extravagant features like bright colored tails that reduce their chances of survival? His father replied, "It's an interesting question." Even though natural selection is the deepest known theory that explains the variety we see around us. Still, it can't answer all the questions. Peacocks have bright colored tails due to sexual selection. Sexual selection! Can you please explain in detail?, asked the boy to his Dad.

Don't worry, my dear son, let's dive deep into evolution to understand this mystery.

Dad: Darwin realized that some traits can't be explained by natural selection. A peacock's tail is heavy, bright colored, and energetically costly. Natural selection should eliminate such traits, yet they exist. He proposed that sexual selection is one of the most powerful forces shaping life, responsible for many traits that otherwise seem useless, costly, or even harmful to survival. The fierce competition among males and the female preference for certain males are due to sexual selection.

Son: How do males evolve to display their traits like strength, wealth, intelligence, dominance, mate guarding, status seeking, etc., and concomitantly, females evolve to have a preference for certain males?

Dad: Two theories that answer your question are:

1. Parental Investment Theory

2. Good gene hypothesis

Parental Investment Theory: The different costs of reproduction create different strategies for males and females. Females produce a few expensive eggs, often invest heavily in their offspring, like gestation and nurturing. They have more to lose from mating with a poor-quality male. Therefore, females are choosy. On the other hand, males produce many cheap sperm, have more to gain by mating frequently. Hence, males compete for mating opportunities.

Good gene hypothesis: Females pick those males that indicate health, resistance to parasites, a strong immune system, etc. All these traits indicate good genetic quality. It's an indirect signal to females that tells them they have genes that help them to survive despite handicaps. These traits serve as honest signals that demonstrate only a strong male can afford such handicaps.

Son: Does the good gene hypothesis mean the same as the Handicap principle?

Dad: Yes, they are the same. Let me explain it in detail.

A trait that is costly to survive with is a reliable signal of genetic fitness, also known as the Handicap principle. The strong and healthy male can afford such handicaps as:

1. A giant peacock's tail

2. Bright color attracts predators

3. Big antlers that take huge energy to grow

These traits become a trustworthy indicator that males have good genes. It works because if the trait is not costly, a weak or unhealthy male could easily fake it. Only a high-quality male can pay for the handicap. Therefore, the handicap becomes the honest advertisement of fitness. Females prefer males who show that they can survive despite the burden. This ensures their offspring inherit the good genes of a male who can pay for the cost.

Sexual selection can override natural selection, leading to flamboyant traits. Female choice drives evolution as much as survival pressures do. Many human traits, such as creativity, intelligence, humor, etc., may function as a mental handicap costly signal of evolutionary fitness. The handicap idea becomes the foundation for explaining that human intelligence evolved partly as a sexual display.

Son: How do intelligence, creativity, humor, etc., evolve as a sexual display?

Dad: Ronald Fisher proposed a theory known as the Runaway sexual selection. It's an evolutionary process in which a female's preference for a trait and the male trait itself reinforce each other, causing the trait to become exaggerated over generations, sometimes to an extreme that harms survival.

Runaway sexual selection works as follows:

1. Females prefer a male with a slightly longer tail. These males get more mates and produce more offspring.

2. Their sons inherit the long tails, and their daughters inherit the preference for long tails.

3. The trait and the preference increase together. More females prefer long tails, and males evolve even longer tails. The preferences get stronger in each generation.

4. The feedback loop runs away. Each generation magnifies the trait until it becomes extremely exaggerated.

   
   

   The trait can become maladaptive. The trait can grow so huge that it reduces survival. A tail so huge that it makes flying harder, colors so bright that they attract predators, and antlers so big that they break easily. But as long as sexual advantage(more mates) outweighs survival advantage, the trait continues to evolve. Sexual selection often overpowers natural selection. The same logic is extended to human traits like intelligence, creativity, humor, art, and music.

Son: Evolution works on the principle of least effort. Sex is extremely inefficient compared to asexual reproduction. In sex, an individual passes only half of their genes and has to find a partner. Mating exposes him to predators, energy, cost, and disease. Males contribute no resources in many species except sperm. In asexual reproduction, every individual can reproduce, passes all their genes, no need for mates and would double their growth rates. Cloning is superior. Why is it not preferred by Natural selection?

Dad: Haha! An interesting insight. Natural Selection favored sex because of the Muller Ratchet. It's an evolutionary concept that explains why asexual reproduction tends to accumulate harmful mutations and why sex and recombination help avoid this problem.

This idea was proposed by geneticist Herman Muller. In asexual organisms, harmful(deleterious) mutations accumulate irreversibly over generations because there is no recombination. Asexual organisms pass on their genome unchanged (except for new mutations). Once all members of the population acquire at least one harmful mutation, it becomes impossible to return to a "mutation-free" state. This irreversible accumulation of bad mutations is the ratchet -- it clicks forward but never backward.

In asexual reproduction, the harmful mutations can be added but can't be removed. Imagine an asexual population where the best genome has zero harmful mutations. Over time, new mutations appear randomly. Some individuals with perfect genomes are lost due to chance events like predation, accidents, and small population size. If all zero-mutation individuals disappear, the population's best is now one harmful mutation. This is the click of a ratchet.

When all 1-mutation individuals are lost, the best remaining genome has two mutations. The ratchet keeps clicking. When harmful mutations accumulate, fitness drops, fertility decreases, survival weakens, and extinction risk rises. It leads to genetic meltdown. Without a mechanism to remove mutations, asexual reproduction faces a chance of long-term extinction.

How does sexual reproduction solve this problem?

Sex involves recombination, which allows harmful mutations to be separated and offspring to inherit cleaner combinations. Natural selection helps eliminate individuals with heavy mutation loads. Through recombination, two individuals with some bad mutations can produce offspring with fewer harmful mutations. Sex can reverse the ratchet, but asexual reproduction can't.

Asexual reproduction is like buying 100 lottery tickets with the same number, but sexual reproduction is like buying 100 lottery tickets with different numbers. If the environment stays stable, clones outperform, and if it changes, genetic variability increases a species' chance that at least some offspring will survive. Asexual reproduction is efficient but fragile, and sexual reproduction is inefficient but resilient.

Sexual reproduction is very effective against parasites. A Red Queen principle in biology says species must constantly evolve to keep pace with their parasites, predators, and competitors. If a species stops evolving, it doesn't stay the same, but it falls behind and risks extinction. Sex exists because it helps organisms keep up in this endless evolutionary race.

Hosts and parasites chase each other in evolutionary cycles. Parasites adapt to exploit the host's most common genotype. That genome becomes vulnerable. Hosts that reproduce sexually produce new, rare genotypes. Parasites are less effective against an unfamiliar combination of genes. Selection favors hosts with rare combinations. Parasites evolve to catch up again. This arms race has no finish line but only constant motion. You have to keep running just to survive. This idea is extended to human progress also. You have to keep innovating to stay in the race. Change is the only constant.

Infidelity, violence, aggression, jealousy, infanticide, etc., are the evolved reproductive strategies of sexual selection. The reproductive success of males is limited by access to females, not resources. Females prefer to mate with the male having good genes, whereas the male wants to mate with as many females as possible to increase his numbers in the gene pool. Male-male competition can lead to lethal fights in animals for access to females. Natural selection often favors reproductive success over morality, niceness, and fairness. It creates psychological adaptations, not moral rules.

Son: Humans are far more intelligent than necessary to survive in the wild. Other primates survive with smaller brains. We spend enormous energy on growing huge brains. Brains are expensive. They burn glucose, require long childhoods, and complicate birth. Why did evolution favor such costly traits?

Dad: Human intelligence evolved partly to attract mates. Just as peacock tails are costly displays of fitness, mental skills signal underlying genetic quality. Creativity, humor, storytelling, music, and art are analogous to mental peacock tails. These skills are hard to fake and costly in terms of energy and learning time, making them an honest signal of fitness. Males who displayed these traits reproduced more successfully. Over generations, this led to ever more exaggerated mental abilities for males and preferences for females. It mirrors the Fisherian runaway process observed in mammals.

Conclusion: Humans spent a vast portion of their evolutionary history in the savannah, where certain behaviors were adaptive and helped our ancestors survive and reproduce. Today, our environment has changed dramatically, but many of those ancient behavioral tendencies remain. When we encounter behaviors we label as immoral, it is often because they are rooted in evolutionary adaptations that no longer fit modern life. Behaviors such as infidelity, jealousy, aggression, competition, and violence are not simply moral failings; they once served specific functions in our evolutionary past. We do not transcend these tendencies by suppressing them, but by understanding them. Viewing these behaviors as adaptive responses rather than personal flaws allows us to gain deeper insight into human relationships. This awareness gives us the ability to respond more consciously, build healthier relationships, and shape a more cooperative and compassionate society. By understanding where we come from, we can choose how we want to live now.

If you have liked this post, please share it with others on WhatsApp, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Please share your feedback in the comment box.

Photo by Praswin Prakashan on Unsplash

Oneness Awakened: Embracing the Universal Self

Once there was a king who led a life of virtue, always committed to honesty and truthfulness. He was deeply pious. One night, he had a frightening dream in which his kingdom was conquered by an enemy ruler. Though the enemy spared his life, he was chained and cast out of his own land. Injured, thirsty, and starving, the king begged for food. Suddenly, a crow dropped a piece of human flesh before him. Driven by hunger, he ate it.

The king woke up, sweating heavily from the nightmare. The following day, he faced an important decision about the kingdom’s affairs. Yet, from the moment he awoke, he kept murmuring, “Is this truth or that truth?” When the ministers and the people gathered to hear his verdict, he repeated the same question without giving an answer.

Nearby lived a wise sage, known for his deep insight, compassion, and love for all beings. One of the ministers invited him to the palace to assist the troubled king. Upon arrival, the sage heard the king’s persistent question and responded, “Both the dream world and the waking world are illusions. The only true reality is the self that witnesses them.”

Hearing this, the king’s confusion lifted instantly. He awakened from his inner turmoil and attained enlightenment.

You might be wondering how just a few words—"Both the dream world and the waking world are illusions. The only true reality is the self that witnesses them."—can lead someone to enlightenment. Before we delve deeper into the meaning of this profound statement, let’s first understand the basics of life.

The Self is not this, not that. It is the witness of all, the eternal seer, the knower of the field. Upanishads

We are so entangled in the web of life that we forget our true nature. We rarely take the time to reflect on questions such as: Who am I? Why am I here? What is the purpose of working if I will die one day? Is there anything beyond death? What is the meaning of life?

We have only a short time in this beautiful galaxy. We become so caught up in non-essential things that we forget to focus on what truly matters. Life is slipping through our fingers, and death draws closer with each passing day. We often believe that death will come to us someday in the distant future, but not now. As a result, we keep postponing the things that are truly valuable in life.

Do not listen to thoughts that tell you, "Don’t be in a hurry." No—take immediate action that will move you beyond the cycle of life and death, or at least bring you closer to your true nature. The technique we are about to discuss for attaining enlightenment is useless unless you apply it in your life. Always act promptly after gaining knowledge, so that you can put your understanding into practice.

Shiva (the Lord of Creation and Destruction) taught this technique to Shakti (the Divine Feminine Energy) as a means to attain enlightenment. The technique is

"Each thing is perceived through knowing. The self shines in space through knowing. Perceive one being as knower and known."

Let's delve deeper to understand this beautiful and profound sutra.

Whatever we know is known through the process of knowing. There is always a known (object), a knower (subject), and knowledge itself. Knowledge bridges the gap between the knower and the known. This concept is easier to understand with a real-life example.

A few weeks ago, I was roaming in the forest when suddenly a young and beautiful peacock spread its wings and began to dance. Everything else disappeared from my sight, and the peacock immediately captured my attention. I experienced a brief pause in the chain of my thoughts—a meditative state, if only for a few seconds. My mind became still, almost as if it were no mind at all. I felt a deep ecstasy and silence within my being. In this experience, the peacock is the object (the known), my mind is the subject (the knower), and my knowledge of the peacock creates the relationship between subject and object.

The moment you become the watcher, you have moved beyond the mind. Adyashanti

We generally focus on the object and rarely pay attention to the subject. Humans have evolved in such a way that our senses are designed to observe the external world, but we have little to help us experience the inner world. We become so accustomed to focusing on objects that we forget about the subject. We seldom take the time to understand or explore the subject—the self.

We live miserable lives because we have never explored our inner world. We rarely pay any attention to the knower—the self. Focusing solely on objects has created an imbalance in our lives.

Now the technique says,

"Each thing is perceived through knowing."

Every object is known through the process of knowledge. Knowledge bridges the gap between the subject and the object. Do not remain focused solely on objects; pay attention to the subject as well. Concentration is the first step in meditation. Focusing on the face of a beloved or on a peacock, for example, is just the beginning. As time passes, gradually shift your attention from the object to the subject. This may be difficult at first, but with practice, you will begin to move in that direction. Attention can create wonders in one’s life. Always be aware of whom you are paying attention to. Wise people intentionally remain ignorant about certain things.

When the peacock is present, everything else immediately fades from awareness. When attention shifts toward the subject, the peacock (the object) disappears from existence. Being aware of both the subject and the object creates balance, because having two points of reference (subject and object) is more balanced than focusing on just one (either subject or object).

Materialistic people chase worldly things. They are too focused on objects like money, power, fame, and status. But alas, they rarely find happiness in these pursuits. Anything outside of yourself can never truly give you happiness. When they become disillusioned with worldly and materialistic objects, they often move to the other extreme: they renounce everything and go to the Himalayas. Yet, they still face the same problem, just in the opposite direction.

In the Himalayas, material things are no longer present to distract them. Previously, they were identified with the object, but now they become obsessed with the subject. However, there always exists a midpoint between these two frames of reference. Similarly, there is a point between the subject and the object known as turiya, or the witnessing self. The witnessing self is different from both the subject and the object. For example, I may look at the peacock (the object) and then observe my mind (the subject). Yet, there is something within me that observes both—one after the other—and cannot be transcended. Anything that cannot be transcended is the ultimate and only truth.

Observe the wonders as they occur around you. Don’t claim them. Feel the artistry moving through and be silent. Rumi

Enlightened individuals are aware of their witnessing self and have therefore transcended the world of both objects and subject. They go beyond both. External objects no longer hold any power over them. The witnessing self is pure consciousness, like an open sky. Thoughts are like clouds that come and go. Enlightened beings observe both their positive and negative thoughts and remain unaffected by them. Thoughts no longer have any power over them.

Siddhartha Gautama became the Buddha when he experienced the witnessing self within. For the rest of his life, he taught the path of the Middle Way. The human mind understands the language of extremes. It is easy to either love or hate a person, but it is extremely difficult to cultivate indifference. The mind dissolves in the Middle Way, which is why it tends to cling to extremes.

Buddhism is not concerned with the origin of life, rituals, or methodologies. It is focused on transforming human psychology and putting an end to human suffering. Buddhist philosophy is based on the Four Noble Truths:

1. Human suffering arises from our unwillingness to accept the impermanence of things. Everything around us is impermanent and subject to change. Decay is inherent in all compounded things. We, too, will leave this planet after a period of time. We falsely cling to ideas, people, titles, images, and status, and this attachment brings suffering.

2. Grasping and clinging to objects is the cause of human suffering. We possess what we love and become slaves to it. We all desire freedom, and moksha (freedom from the cycle of birth and death) is our ultimate goal. Trying to make fluid things static brings suffering. Everything around us is in a state of constant flux, yet out of ignorance, we attempt to hold onto these ever-changing things, which is impossible. As long as we do not accept the reality of change, we remain entangled in the endless chain of cause and effect. Karma does not liberate us; instead, it keeps us bound in the vicious cycle of birth and death.

3. Nirvana (moksha) is possible through right mindfulness. The Middle Path helps us attain liberation. Maya—the veil of ignorance that creates the illusion of separateness—and the ego both dissolve, and we become one with all in a state of superconsciousness.

4. Nirvana can be achieved through the eight fold path of self development that leads to Buddhahood. The following are the eight fold paths of self development:

   
   

   1. Right View: Understanding reality as it is, including the Four Noble truths(suffering, its cause, its cessation, and the path to cessation). It involves seeing things without delusion, recognizing impermanence, and understanding karma.

   2. Right Intention: Cultivating wholesome intentions, such as renouncing harmful desires, fostering goodwill, and embracing non-violence. It's about aligning the mind with ethical and compassionate motives.

   3. Right Speech: Speaking truthfully, kindly, and constructively. This means avoiding lying, slander, harsh words, and idle gossip to promote harmony and understanding.

   4. Right Action: Acting in ways that are ethical and non-harmful, such as refrain from killing, stealing, or engaging in harmful behaviors. It emphasizes compassion and respect for all beings.

   5. Right Livelihood: Earning a living in a way that doesn't harm others or oneself, avoiding professions that cause suffering, like those involving violence, deceit, or exploitation.

   6. Right Effort: Making a conscious effort to cultivate positive mental states and abandon negative ones. This includes preventing unwholesome thoughts, overcoming them, and nurturing wholesome ones.

   7. Right Mindfulness: Developing awareness of the present moment, observing body, feelings, mind, and phenomenon without attachment or aversion. It's often practiced through meditation techniques like mindfulness of breathing.

   8. Right Concentration: Cultivating focused, one-pointed attention through meditative practices leading to deep states of mental clarity and tranquility which support insight and liberation.

Now the next part of Sutra,

"The Self shines in space through knowing. Perceive one being as knower and known."

When a person becomes aware of both the subject and the object through knowledge, he comes to realize the witnessing self. The witnessing self shines within him, just as the stars shine in the night sky. He transcends the world of objects and subject through the light of the witnessing self. He is in the world, yet the world does not affect him. His presence is like a lotus leaf in water—though it is in the water, the water cannot wet it. Similarly, he is in the world, yet nothing can taint him. You are not your name, job, status, mind, or body. You are the witnessing self who observes your birth, childhood, youth, and old age, yet remains unaffected by them.

How does suffering cease to exist when one is rooted in their being?

Suppose someone abuses you and calls you bad names. His words become objects, and your mind reacts to these words, evoking emotions. By practicing the above technique, you become aware of both the object (the person who hurts you) and the subject (your mind’s response to the stimulus). The witnessing self observes both the subject and the object as a passive watcher, without reacting. The witnessing self remains unaffected throughout the entire situation.

If you can sit as a witness to your mind, you are free from all suffering. Sadhguru

Lord Krishna says in the Shrimad Bhagavad Gita, “The sword cannot cut the soul, water cannot wet it, and fire cannot burn it.” In Hinduism, the witnessing self is referred to as the soul. That is why suffering does not affect the enlightened soul. Similarly, an enlightened being remains unaffected by pleasure. An enlightened being moves beyond both pain and pleasure—beyond duality. So much may be happening around him, but nothing affects him.

Girls are very close to enlightenment. Every month, they experience significant pain during menstruation. This pain can serve as a wake-up call for them to pursue enlightenment. During their periods, changes occur within their bodies that cause discomfort. These internal changes are the objects, and the mind’s reaction to these stimuli becomes the subject. Their witnessing self observes both the subject and the object. In the presence of the witnessing self, pain holds no power.

By feeling the pain as deeply as possible and simply observing it, the very act of awareness can transform their being and help them move toward enlightenment. Observe and feel all negative emotions as a passive watcher, and notice the changes this brings to your life. Work diligently on yourself and strive to turn every negative experience into a positive one.

Does it ring a bell? Do you remember what the sage told the king in the anecdote?

Yes, you got it right! The waking and dreaming worlds are unreal; the witnessing self is the only truth. The king understands the futility of both the object and the subject, returns to his center—the witnessing self—and becomes enlightened.

Practice this sutra every day and observe the changes it brings to your life. Gradually, you will develop the ears of tolerance, the eyes of compassion, and speak the language of love. In the final stage, you will be liberated and become one with the universe.

If you have liked this post, please share it with others on WhatsApp, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Please share your feedback in the comment box.

Photo by Singh on Unsplash